A different kind of recycling

Fantastic though The British Museum is, I think there's a reasonable argument for re-naming it "The (Partly) British Museum", given that a fair amount of it is the loot of imperialism. 

Making a bee-line straight for the Africa section, I was slightly shocked, if in no way surprised, to find that the 'Africa' section lumps the entire continent together, as though every cultural meme in the world's second-largest continent was just a variation of an easy to digest African whole. In short, it reproduces the stereotypical way in which Africa has been so often depicted for decades. The approach that leads even well-educated people to talk about this place, containing minimum 1,250 languages, as though it was just one country. I should point out that there are several wings devoted to Egypt.

This leads to a feeling that there's no real narrative holding the exhibits together. The swords are together, the clothes, the hats, the sculptures, all together. They're all grouped aesthetically rather than by culture, so if you want to learn much about history, you aren't going to get a great deal out of it. Judging by the number of cameras everywhere, I'd say the layout works well for those wanting to get as many interesting shots as possible.

Regardless, the exhibit does have a power of it's own. For better or for worse, one of the most eye-catching exhibits draws on one of the strongest African stereotypes, war. The AK-47 in particular. I've been aware of artists and craftsmen melting down old guns to either re-purpose or to send an artistic message - see this excellent blog post from Nico on a project in Liberia.

The body made from sight leaves, beak from bayonets, feathers from recoil springs.

The message, I suppose is one of defiance. That of a form of beauty being born from a machine designed specifically for killing and asserting power over others. It is a brutal kind of beauty, the bird looking rather skeletal. Or maybe it isn't beauty at all, maybe it's a mockery. Whatever it might be, the fact that men and children have likely looked down one of those sight leaves before firing on someone is rather haunting. A dark joke if nothing else but in the west most humour involving Africa is quite dark.

Right at the front, though, is a more stark and surely a more powerful message. The 'Throne of Weapons' is a stand-in for the message delivered by the entire exhibit. Everything played up to simplified stereotypes. It would be disingenuous of me to argue too strongly against these, though. In many cases, African presidents are held up by that massive threat of force, and are de facto presidents for life. 

I suspect that, in a hopeful gesture, they've deliberately made the throne uncomfortable looking, and perhaps slightly unstable. The sad reality is that from north to south, it has for a long time paid well in Africa to rule your people at the barrel of a gun, being in no way specific about any countries.

As an aside, I often wonder whether there is a significant relationship between countries having the word 'Democratic' in their name and being ruled by dictators. Democratic Republic of the Congo, Democratic People's Republic of Korea. Etcetera.

Simplified though it may be, to some extent the museum has to manage people's expectations, and most come to this place to look at mummies, sarcophaguses and that kind of thing. I just wish they strove more to challenge people's perceptions rather than to reinforce the simplified way of thinking that leads many to fear or mistrust Africa. Promoting a drastically simplified notion of African-ness encourages this ignorance.
A subtle appreciation of African cultures isn't going to do a whole lot to solve poverty, other perhaps than to bring more tourists to the place, but it will broaden minds. And Ethiopia has a lot of exceptional things for tourists. A big glass of fresh mango & avocado juice for $1 being a good starting point.

Some more photos from the Africa exhibit. I can't remember what they're of.